Lighting Guidance
Most rivers in the London region are designated as wildlife corridors. The Thames as a Site of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation (SMINC) has the highest designation. Yet throughout the night it receives wasted and unwanted light pollution from residential and commercial properties.
Light from buildings spills more than 200 metres onto the river Thames and the vegetation lining Barge Walk. Light affects the wildlife corridor, illuminates the water, and the tree canopies that only bats (and other wildlife) are using.
Bats such as Daubenton’s bat use river corridors to move to their foraging areas and roost sites. Light pollution causes fragmentation of the corridors and inhibits movement of light shy species. Bat retinas are specifically adapted for low light conditions.
Insects form the basis of bat prey. They are also important for all bird species in order to feed their young. Insects can be attracted to light. Lamps with a high ultraviolet (UV) content can “hoover” up to 75% of the insects from a habitat. This is called the vacuum effect. Around one third of these insects will die.
The Bat Conservation Trust state:
- Light shields: trees and vegetation should be retained as they act as light shields.
- Don’t use reflective surfaces under lights;
- Use controlled management systems (CMS) to switch off the lights when not in use; dimming capacity, lumimotion - if it is near sensitive habitat.
- Lights should
have appropriate shielding, back plates, barn doors, its done in LBRuT (LB Richmond);
- No lighting of historic buildings or structures;
- Concerts with lighting, fireworks etc. should only be scheduled for the end
of August, we found the smoke affected the bats more than bangs; and
- Use narrow spectrum, avoid white and don’t use UV light to minimise the range of species affected by light
Any new lighting proposal, which may have an impact on a water body or green space, should be accompanied by a statement to show that there will be no impact on any species that may be using that water body or green space. A statement should demonstrate as to how any impact will be mitigated. This statement may require evidence such as a bat survey. Post development monitoring may also be required.
Lights should not be on automated switching but should be extinguished after the last user. So basic- but now ignored - as these sites are managed by a mixture of Trusts and Friends Groups so there should be something in the wording of the lease/management agreement to state that car park lights should be switched off as soon as possible.
When designing lighting, start at
the feature (the river) and work backwards with 0 lux at the feature. This may mean using low
transmittance glass on windows, sensors and vegetation screening. Black netting can cut down some transmission from sports pitches, unfortunately its mainly used to cut down glare for people not wildlife.
Case study: Warren Footpath
Urban gradient
The extent of urbanized land is increasing, with implications for habitat quality and connectivity. Studies show pipistrelle bat activity is reduced in areas where the proportion of built surface exceeds 60%, implying the existence of a threshold for bats. Protecting and establishing tree networks and river corridors may improve the resilience of some bat populations to urbanisation. If we don’t switch lights off we may be rendering parts of London’s rivers no longer suitable as wildlife corridors.
Further info
http://www.batsandlighting.co.uk/
http://www.lbp.org.uk/downloads/Publications/Management/lighting_and_bats.pdf
http://www.bio.bris.ac.uk/research/mammal/bats.html
http://www.bats.org.uk/pages/bats_and_lighting.html
https://www.furesfen.co.uk/recommendations/
http://wrg.co.uk/uploads/article948/Bat%20Report%20Appendix%20C.pdf
http://www.britastro.org/dark-skies/
http://www.rcep.org.uk/reports/sr-2009-light/documents/RCEP_artificiallight.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment